RSS feeds in the directory: 2799
Added today: 0
Added yesterday: 0
News portal PRAVO.RU
Arbitration court of the Moscow district has considered the complaint, VTB 24 and left in force the decision of first instance and appeal. The Bank is obliged to pay more than 1 billion rubles to the claimant – the Federal state unitary enterprise "Administration of civil airports (airfields)". The decision was published in the files of arbitration cases.
Best lawyers in the country, artificial intelligence as master and wishes from co-chair, AYUR - as the winners of the rating "Pravo.ru-300" - see our photo essay. Leading law firm determined this year, once in 23 nominations. So the number of participants toristone ceremony compared to the previous year was 2 times more.
The constitutional court examined complaints Galina Ahmadeeva, Alexander Sergeyev and Stanislav Lusaka. With them on claims of the tax authorities was to recover damages caused to them by crimes. They challenged the constitutionality of provisions of Civil, Criminal, Criminal procedural and Tax codes.
In the dispute between the investor and the film producer, the courts disagreed whether a judicial order to oblige the producer to make a film. On the one hand, if the contract provides for such a duty, why not? On the other hand to remove the film will be Director, not producer. The case was investigated by economcally the Supreme court.
Yesterday at The Ritz Carlton, Moscow, a solemn ceremony of awarding the leaders of the eighth annual rating of Russia "Right.ru-300". The guests could enjoy a cocktail, meet friends and colleagues, musical surprises, and the main intrigue of the year – who was the best. The winners were determined in 23 nominations: "Probono", "Law", "Tax law" and others.
Rating "Right.ru-300" 2017 was the eighth and most ambitious in the history of existence. The number of participants compared to last year increased by more than 20%, and for project evaluation – 30%. We are very pleased that increases the credibility of our products among market participants, increasing its prestige, competition among law firms.
Review of the jurisprudence issued by the Supreme court December 6, explains when you can and cannot attract the liquidator to administrative responsibility. In one case, the courts explained why it is necessary to apply a special rule to punish the Manager, and the other explained, when the violation is not considered ongoing.
The Bill was prepared with the aim of increasing the liability of the carrier in case of forced refusal of the passenger from air carriage in connection with the delayed departure. If the delay is more than three hours, the passenger shall be refunded the fee for the ticket.
, the Supreme court issued a judicial review "About some questions arising by consideration by arbitration courts of Affairs about the administrative offences provided for by Chapter 14 of the administrative code". The document explains how to punish a store for the sale of alcohol at night, can you run a kindergarten without an educational license, but as a pharmacy to sell drugs without a prescription.
If a meeting of residents decided that the only Parking for owners – is it available to tenants, with the consent of the landlord? In one of the HOA decided that no, the punishment has deactivated the remotes from the barrier. The owner appealed against it in court. Two courts ruled in favor of the HOA, but the Supreme court reversed their decision and explained what violations they saw.
Yuri Rahimmula in 2016, was fined 500 rubles for speeding, but the resolution of the fine came after the 20-day period of discounts under article 32.2 of the administrative code. The courts refused to restore grace period payment, and in fact had to understand the Constitutional court.
ASGM under one of the bankruptcy cases will consider the request for inclusion in the bankruptcy estate of cryptocurrency, which belongs to a physical person. This was announced by the liquidator Alexei Leonov, speaking at the conference "Bitcoin and other products blockchain technology as intellectual property", his words leads to RAPE.
The constitutional court announced the decision on the appeal of four women working in the North. They sought recognition unconstitutional provisions, which are set for employees working in adverse conditions, the same social guarantees as any other.
What awaits the real estate developers and real estate investors in 2018, how will the transition to project financing and how much more expensive housing for a buyer with changes in legislation? Talked about the participants of the conference "development and construction: legal issues", organized by the Right.ru.
Is it Necessary to register the building at the purchase and sale of monetary debts from shareholders? Who will pay fines for traffic violation if the car was sold, but not extended to the police? Can I force a former Director to pay the loan company if he vouched for her only at that time, while working at the firm? These questions put before the Supreme court.