RSS feeds in the directory: 2817
Added today: 0
Added yesterday: 0
Ukrainian foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin, speaking on the TV channel "112 Ukraine", said that Kiev is preparing documents to withdraw from the countries of the CIS. Commenting on this statement, a former member of the Federation Council, and now President of the Foundation "Legal state" Yevgeny Tarlo, referring to the agreement on the establishment of the Commonwealth, noted that the cessation of Kiev's membership in this organization will lead to the loss of recognition of the external borders of Ukraine.
the Output of one of the founders of the Commonwealth, and an attempt to destroy this Union of post-Soviet countries will open a Pandora's box not only in the former Soviet Union, but also on its external borders.
After the creation of the CIS has led to the fact that instead of the Soviet Union, a new entity — the Commonwealth of Independent States, which has assumed responsibility for compliance with all international obligations of the USSR. Including the Final act of the conference on security and cooperation in Europe in 1975, the link to which is in the Agreement on the establishment of the Commonwealth.
It was the Helsinki Declaration guaranteed the "territorial integrity" of European countries. However, based on the text of the document, the inviolability of the external borders of the state were distributed directly to the signatory countries. The existence of an Agreement on creation of the CIS, where it was a joint responsibility of the former Soviet republics, has allowed legally to extend the standards to such agreements as the Helsinki and Ukraine.
it is Interesting that up to this Kiev, where always loved and love to refer to the Final act of the conference on security and cooperation in Europe, has done everything to undermine the legitimacy of the Declaration of 1975.
In 2015 the Verkhovna Rada adopted the law of Ukraine "About the condemnation of the Communist and national socialist (Nazi) totalitarian regimes in Ukraine and the prohibition of propaganda of their symbols". Thus, legally, the Soviet regime was recognized as a Nazi analogue. But the Helsinki act on the part of the Soviet Union, was signed by none else but by the General Secretary of the CPSU Leonid Brezhnev. From the point of view of Kiev, it's about the same as if a Final act was signed by the führer of the NSDAP. In fact, the Kiev regime has acknowledged the signature of the USSR under the 1975 paper is illegitimate.
this is despite the fact that in relation to the Helsinki accords and without that lawyers made a lot of comments because of its declarative nature, that is non-binding.
Now, aiming to withdraw from the CIS, Kiev, apparently, wants to completely neutralize the action of the Final act.
this is happening against the backdrop of increasing interest to the Ukrainian territory from the Western neighbors — Poland, Hungary, and Romania.
But in Kiev, pretending not to notice this interest, and even provokes to his territorial claims from the West. In 2008-2009, the "orange" godfather of the current Guarantor has already created such a precedent. Agreeing before the International court of justice the question of ownership of snake island, Kiev, recognized the fact that the Ukrainian border may be subject to disputes. Although the snake then remained part of Ukraine, but this precedent has led to the fact that Romania immediately filed a new claim. She demanded to "return" her to the Danube Delta and referred to the Hague court the question of ownership of the island Maikan.
that Kiev will be able to rely in legal terms, to resist such claims after the withdrawal from the CIS?
Along with the Helsinki accords in Ukraine, it is customary to refer to the Budapest Memorandum of 1994. But this document was never ratified by any one party. Moreover, even before the annexation of Crimea to Russia, in 2013, the USA and the EU violated the provisions of the Memorandum on the rejection of economic pressure against Belarus, introducing sanctions against it. In response to the legitimate claims of Minsk, Washington relied on declarative and non-binding document signed in Budapest. Since then, the Memorandum lost its effect.
Remains the UN Charter. But in paragraph 4 of article 2 is only a call to abandon the use of force against the territorial integrity of other countries. Thus the very existence of disputes over territories is recognized when it is proposed to solve them through peaceful negotiations.
Not thinking about the consequences, the leadership in Kiev in a hurry to open a Pandora's box of territorial claims on the former Soviet Union. But first suffer themselves. Recall, claims to Ukraine is Poland.
The annual message of the Petro Poroshenko 08.09.2016 at 06:12
Kiev pretends to care about "separatists" 30.08.2016 at 06:11
Trouble in Ukraine - the government does not know the language society 30.08.2016 at 05:56
The results of the 2016 square 25.08.2016 at 04:31
Day broken promises 24.08.2016 at 06:20
Over the Donbas thickens the shadow of war 19.08.2016 at 05:32
For the Kremlin, Poroshenko is now the inability of 15.08.2016 at 05:48
Prevented terrorist attacks in the Republic of Crimea 10.08.2016 at 10:45
Kiev refused the Russian Ambassador 04.08.2016 at 04:57
Sect UA 24.06.2016 at 08:44